Personal Injury Lawsuit

The minimal information concerning the approval of disability benefit applications has caused confusion and erroneous belief about the entire process of eligibility. This is the reason why people have second thoughts in filing a claim even if they have the qualifications.

Let us take a look at some misconceptions concerning the process of disability benefit application.

1. The Social Security Administration (SSA) automatically rejects first-time applicants.
In reality, there are no guidelines or measures in place that can control the process of granting SSA benefits in a manner that would ensure outright denial of first-time applications. While it is true that 60 to 70 percent of disability applications get rejected, this is due to the ignorance of claimants to discover ways on how they can improve their chances of getting a successful claim. Likewise, applicants make the mistake of filling up a fresh application form after having their claims rejected rather than making an appeal.

2. The SSA rejects most disability claims most of the time in order to save the money of the government.
This misconception is absolutely false. Disability administrators have certain procedures which have something to do with controlling the quality of approved and disapproved claims to ensure that the decisions will not be altered right away until the resolved claims have been evaluated for final approval.

Most of the time, the disability examiners will not give in to requests to pass the claim since they are allaying fears that cases which come back for revisions may have an impact on the way they perform their jobs. Thus, quality control has a role in the volume of rejected cases. It is not advisable to believe that the government exerts an effort to save cash by denying appropriate cases.

3. Applicants should first meet the age requirement in order to avail of disability claims.
There is no general policy that sets forth an age restriction for which an applicant may be qualified to avail and get approved for disability benefits. However, older applicants are in a much better position to have their SSD applications approved.
In general, the claim for disability is determined by the strength of the medical records they present to back up their application. Another factor that determines claim approval is ability of the applicant to resume their previous work or to be engaged in some kind of work.

When filing for a SSD benefit, the applicant’s doctor should prove that their patient is indeed disabled based on clinical and laboratory results. The sad thing about this is that conditions that lead to disability are sometimes hard to diagnose through objective testing. So your legal representation should make sure that your medical records are properly reported.

For someone who is not well-versed with the entire legal system, understanding its complexities can be a daunting task. But for those who are keen on making a claim and wants to be certain about the proper application procedure, their best chance of getting approved is by soliciting the help of social security benefits lawyers.

To help you with social security disability benefits and other related issues, you can consult with our experienced social security benefits lawyers. Get in touch with our expert social security lawyers by logging on to our website.

Read more

If you have been the unfortunate victim of an accident that was someone else’s fault, a lot of questions may be running through your head. For example, ‘how much is my personal injury case worth?’, ‘how do I get maximum compensation for my injuries?’, ‘when is my case worth a lot?’ There is no magic formula for these questions, but following a few simple rules can maximize your chances of getting a hefty compensation in a personal injury case:

Read more

Compensation claims made against the Yorkshire police in the past year look set to add up to almost £500,000 in costs and compensation.

The force is being investigated over a series of claims for ‘malfeasance’ which includes accusations of wrongful arrest, false imprisonment, assault, malicious prosecution and interference with property, among other things.

The compensation payouts are expected to reach £220,000, while legal costs amounting to almost £40,000.

In addition, employer liability was being looked into, with personal injury caused by negligence and industrial accidents high on the list of wrongdoings. If proved, this could cost the force another £158,000 in compensation pay outs and £81,000 worth of legal fees.

Since April last year, 118 malfeasance claims were made against the Yorkshire Police, which equated to £6,753 in payouts. 

When such claims are being investigated, the force will often use private solicitors who specialise in personal injury, or other specific areas of law. For this reason, legal costs can be high.

MP Phil Willis says that the prediction of such large costs is not something to be worried about:
“I don’t find these figures unusual because the force always has to take the worst-case scenario - in terms of accounting practices they are not allowed to do anything other than that.”

Despite the seemingly high number of personal injury and compensation claims made against the Yorkshire police force, no police officers were suspended or fired during the 2007/2008 period.

Mr Willis says that the investigation of such claims is necessary to keep the police force on their toes and “to ensure North Yorkshire Police is one of the best-quality forces in the land.”

Read more