Simple Accident Claim not Fully Explained

July 8th, 2008

Compensation for accidents claims can be complex and difficult to work out. In some cases the issue of who is at fault may not be clear cut and it could take time to collect the evidence to determine the facts of the accident.

In other cases the injuries sustained may take some time to develop and until that happens, no one is really sure of the entire extent of the damage, and thus what would constitute a fair amount of compensation. However in a few cases some things seem to be pretty clear cut, in which case determining liability and settling the case should be a fairly rapid process. This is what was thought about John Dai’s case of a simple road traffic accident, but it turned out to be a lot more complicated due to actions by his lawyers. 

John Dai, from Australia was hit from behind by another car whilst slowing for traffic lights in his station wagon. He had been on his way to work, at a computer accessory company when the accident had happened. The case was simple enough as the other driver was clearly at fault, all that needed to happen was to arrange compensation through the insurance companies. Although Mr Dai held Australian residency his English abilities were limited so he sought the services of a solicitors firm which offered a translating service so he can understand the case in his native Chinese language. Throughout the case Mr Dai kept abreast with all the paperwork and attended the various necessary meetings. When his case was finally settled he attended a settlement meeting with his lawyers and was presented with a check for $155 thousand Australian dollars. Mr Dai confirmed with his lawyers at the time that this amount was all that was due to him and his lawyers agreed. However when re-checked his paperwork from the case he sawa figure of $240 thousand dollars in a letter about a compromise offer with the insurer. Mr Dai wanted to double check the figure so went back to his lawyers but nothing changed.

Mr Dai only found out the truth of how much he received in compensation when a year later he applied for a health card but was told that he was not eligible because of a lump sum of $375 thousand dollars he had received due to the crash. This was a huge shock as Mr Dai had never been aware of the full amount paid out for the accident claim. When signing the final documentation there had been no mention of the legal fees his lawyers were going to charge him and Mr Dai never received a bill. Adding the amount of compensation Mr Dai actually received, to necessary state costs still left $125 thousand dollars unaccounted for.  The Lawyers in question say the case file has now been lost meaning finding the truth of the missing money’s whereabouts is going to be difficult. This story serves to remind victims of accidents to agree on legal costs prior to making the claim for compensation.

Read more

Posted in Personal Injury Lawsuit | No Comments »

Oregon Personal Injury Attorneys Lawyers - Selecting the Right Attorney

July 7th, 2008

Your first appointment with a personal injury attorney can be intimidating when you do work with lawyers or the legal process on a regular basis. Here are some things to keep in mind when consulting with a lawyer concerning your personal injury case:

Read more

Posted in Personal Injury Lawsuit | No Comments »

No Win No Fee No Fuss

July 6th, 2008

There are countless adverts for No Win No Fee compensation on television, on the radio, in magazines and on billboards across the UK but is it really that simple?

Now that Legal Aid is no longer available for injury claims, No Win No Fee has become the most popular way to make a compensation claim. Making a personal injury claim in the UK should usually cost nothing for the person who has been injured. This is because all legal costs should be covered by the third party, the party that caused the injury to the claimant. Your compensation pay out is yours and yours alone. If you claim is unsuccessful the majority of solicitors will have arranged a no win no fee arrangement beforehand. Insurance will cover you against the other side’s costs; meaning that you are safe from paying put any fees yourself.

Claims cannot be made for any injury. A small cut to your arm or a twisted ankle are not injuries that are life threatening or have caused financial loss. Just because you have had an accident or relieved an injury, does not mean you will receive compensation. It is common practice for your personal in jury claim lawyer to advise you as to whether or not your case is suitable for this type of claim arrangement.

It is advisable to go to a reputable firm of No Win No Fee lawyers and make sure that they give you the time and care your case deserves. A solicitor who is an expert in your type of injury claim will be appointed to you in order to give you the best advice possible. Your solicitor will not get paid if you are not successful with your claim so they will enquire at some depth into the evidence you have to support your case.

Most of these companies will have websites from which you can gauge the amount of compensation you may receive and if your injury is serious enough to make a claim in the first place. Online forms can be filled out and a company representative will get back to you and further your claim. The process will be explained to you from your solicitor sending the defendant a Letter of Claim to the claim going to court. You will then be put in touch with a solicitor in your area who will take over your case and attempt to get you justice and a lump sum.

It seems as though making a compensation claim is really fuss free and with plenty of information available you can see whether your injury is worth taking the case to court.

Read more

Posted in Personal Injury Lawsuit | No Comments »

Personal Injury Lawyer Protects Your Legal Interests!

July 5th, 2008

Accidents can happen at almost any given time and for a variety of different reasons. Many of us tend to fall around our home, one of the most common places for us to have accidents. At other times, however, we may be injured as a result of an accident that occurred because of somebody’s negligence. This can either be negligence on a personal level or perhaps even on an industrial level. Regardless, the need for compensation exists whenever these injuries occur for these reasons. A personal injury lawyer will be able to help you to get that compensation and to walk you through every step of the process.

Read more

Posted in Personal Injury Lawsuit | No Comments »

General Negligence in Perspective

July 4th, 2008

In its broadest sense, negligence means carelessness. Negligence, in its strict sense, is a “conduct that is culpable because it falls short of what a reasonable person would do to protect another individual from foreseeable risks of harm.”

Read more

Posted in Personal Injury Lawsuit | No Comments »

Bus Driver Banned For Injuring Passengers Through Reckless Driving

July 3rd, 2008

A bus driver from Edinburgh has been fined five hundred pounds and banned from driving for nine months after causing a crash which resulted in injuries including whiplash, because he was waving to friends. Mr Chalmers was a driver for First Group buses at the time of the crash.

Read more

Posted in Personal Injury Lawsuit | No Comments »

Recovering Compensation Through a Wrongful Death Lawsuit

July 2nd, 2008

Even though money cannot make your life whole again, these are the two main reasons why people seek compensation through a wrongful death lawsuit: to help ease financial burdens caused by the loss, and to punish those responsible.

Read more

Posted in Personal Injury Lawsuit | No Comments »

Increasing Work-Related Safety to Avoid Accidents at Work

July 1st, 2008

According to the International Labour Organisation, or ILO, website, every year more than 2 million people die from accidents at work or work-related diseases and every day, on average, some 5,000 or more women and men around the world lose their lives because of work-related accidents and illness.

The ILO has also standardised work as we know it into 17 different categories against which every ILO member is required to report. Thus, one of our tasks upon registration of a business, is to determine which class that business best fits.

In America, 352 incidents were recorded for 2007, most of which (84) were in the construction industry. Most persons at the seminar seemed to have expected that. What they didn’t expect is that the sector called Public Administration & Defence; Compulsory Social Security would report the second highest number of incidents at 64. The Hotels/Restaurant/Guest House sector was also prominent with 61 incidents as was Wholesale & Retail trade; repair of motor vehicles, motorcycles, personal & household goods with 41 incidents A possible explanation for the prominence of these sectors of the economy in the incidence of work related problems is that these are the areas where most persons are employed. Indeed, these four classes accounted for 837 (or 47%) of all business registered in the Federation in 2006 and approximately 63% (over 17,000) of all the jobs (not workers as some persons do multiple jobs).

At Social Security for the said period, Americans paid 881 benefit types, mostly injury (565) and medical expenses (243). They paid to send 19 persons for overseas treatment. Lacerations, breaks/fractures, trauma and burns were the most common injuries reported by the doctors and the back and the limbs (upper and lower) were most affected. Thankfully, only about 4% of reported incidents were diseases that resulted from the workplace with no fatalities.

When historical data is examined, there is no significant increase in the number of work related incidents from year to year - and indeed, those reported in the Agricultural sector showed a marked decline in the last 3 years, especially since the re-organisation of the sugarcane industry. In 2007, these incidents resulted in payments of $1,070,000.00. This is an 8% increase in payments on the year before. In addition, these injured people were off work for almost 8000 days. (There are 230 -235 working days per year). This seems to suggest, among other things, that work related incidents are becoming more and more severe, and care has become more sophisticated.

So why is Social Security concerned? Well, the American public is the one to manage workplace insurance through their Employment Injury Branch - that extra 1% of wages that only the employer is required to pay. It covers accidents and incidents in the workplace and sometimes on the way to work and on the way home from work, especially when the journey is done in an employer-approved transportation. Under this branch, Social Security pays for wage replacement, medical bills, funeral, disability, survivors’ pension, overseas travel costs and constant care allowance.

What can you do to stay safe and create a healthy workplace? Be sensible. Wear appropriate protective gear at all times. Follow all safety guidelines at all times. Be alert at all times. Educate yourself about the hazards of the job. Eat well, sleep well, keep your body drug free. Different industries have different requirements, so know what is required and do it until it becomes habit. Fashion must take a back seat to safety. That young construction worker who pulled up his trousers 10 times in 15 minutes is putting himself and his colleagues at risk.

Read more

Posted in Personal Injury Lawsuit | No Comments »

Why You May Need an Insurance Medical Temporary Plan

June 30th, 2008

You might be traveling and you do not have the assurance that you are going to be safe throughout your travel but, with a short term insurance plan, you will be able to enjoy yourself knowing that you are covered against any accident or incident that many happen and this is a temporary medical insurance.

Read more

Posted in Personal Injury Lawsuit | No Comments »

Injuries Sparked by Fireworks

June 29th, 2008

With the Fourth of July rapidly approaching, many people across the country are gearing up for a fun week of barbeques, parades, speeches, and fireworks. Of those activities, fireworks are inherently dangerous. Their name alone should clue people in to the danger related to them. Unfortunately, a name with “fire” in it is not enough to prevent injuries.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that nearly 10,000 people are injured each year. In 2006, 11 people died from injuries that were caused by fireworks. The nearly 10,000 people injured were just the ones treated in emergency rooms. We really have no way of telling how many people are afflicted with minor injuries and don’t seek treatment. Of all of the injuries that end up in hospitals, 5% require hospitalization. The care these people receive goes beyond an in and out visit. They have to stay in the hospital beyond a few hours.

In 2006, 2/3s of all fireworks-related injuries occurred between June 16th and July 16th. Out of all of the injuries, 1 out of every 3 injuries was to an individual under the age of 15. Individuals that were male were also injures three times as frequently as female individuals. Of all of the injuries to people, 47% of the injuries afflicted people who were under the age of 20.

The body parts that were most frequently injured were the hands, eyes, head, face, and ears. The hands were injured 2,300 times in a year; the eyes 1,500 times; the head, face, and ears were injured 1,400 times. Overall, the injuries were most frequently burns. More than 50% of all injuries were burn injuries. This injury was the most common injury except on people who were hurt on the head or in the eyes. In these cases, contusions, lacerations, and foreign bodies in the eye occurred more frequently.

Fireworks’ injuries are associated with blindness, third degree burns, and permanent scarring. None of these things, most likely, will go away with time.

In addition to the injuries that fireworks can directly inflict on people, they are also capable of causing life-threatening residential and motor vehicle fires. Even if people are not in vehicles or homes, there is still a considerable degree of damage done.

More than 1/3 of all of the deaths that occurred were the result of professional devices being sold illegally to consumers. In 2006, firecrackers were responsible for roughly 1,300 injuries; sparklers caused 1,000 injuries; and rockets, including bottle rockets, were the cause of 800 injuries.

For more information on the dangers of fireworks, please visit http://www.habush.com.

Read more

Posted in Personal Injury Lawsuit | No Comments »

« Previous Entries